How far are we going to break up this Stub Category. Is a stub for everything going to far? -- Esemono 16:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Should all the ages of the covenant be in this stubs section? We know virtually nothing about these ages and almost all of the data in those articles is purely speculation on it's title. Until we can obtain more data from Halo 3 or some other source I think we should leave them alone. Black Mercy 13:28, 1 October 2006
I think the Covenant ages should all be put into one page. It would be a lot less of a stub that way. Also many of these pages can be put into new categories. The Battle of Installation 05 can be included as part of a battle history section. The Covenant Ages can be combined into Covenant History. We don't know much but we can put what we do know into combined pages instead of stubs.Dcooleo 19:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree that one article on the Covenant ages would be better than 9 stubs. --Doktor Despot 15:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Let it be known, that on this day: 27 October, 2007, I fixed all of the double redirects, by myself, over the course of the last 30 minutes (1:07-1:37). You're all welcome and I hope I get a promotion.Eduardo Jimenez Comm ContributionsC Company
Stubs as a Stub Edit
I noticed that the Category of stubs is on its own list, is that intentional?Potatom 18:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Why the User Talk pages listed as stubs? Edit
Over 200 User Talk pages are listed as stubs. I have no idea why they are there - I even examined the code of several pages, and there's no stub tag! How can this be fixed? (Admins?) -- Nutarama 18:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Stub category outdated? Edit
Hi, I notice that the stubs category page is somewhat out of date. Please let me know if the current one has been moved somewehre. As far as I can tell the following links have no content or lead nowhere;
The stubs page is linked to from the Main Page so I think it should be kept updated.
Thanks for any assistance.