Talk: Chat/Archive 2

Request for Chat Moderation rights

Evodvi (Take 2) (Approved)

• Nominator: Vidmas7er
• Reason for nomination: I believe that Evodvi would make a good addition to the chat moderators. He is on everyday and we currently need that support. Not to mention that he is a nice person on chat and doesn't really get into arguments.
• Date of nomination: March 16th, 2012

For (11/1)

1. Support - As per nominator.
   
    ^talk
2. Low Support - While I believe he has a GREAT potential, we have a bunch of Cmods. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)
3. Support - As per nom-nom-nom-nomination. :3 Berry Punch http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/BerryPunch.png ^(Contribs) 00:02, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support - He is very strong in this factor, I'm not sure of his strength as a mod, but I believe he will do his best. --Terra-287 01:23, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support - As per nomination. Sgt Stacker117 16:50, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support - As per nomination. SheerAvenger777 BAM, SAID THE LADY 22:46, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support - Per nomination or something. —Octavia ^{(Contribs) (Blog)}
8. Support - As per nomination. Pinkie Pie http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/IconSIG1.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
9. Support - As per nomination. Sgt D Grif
10. Support - As per nomination Agent Carolina
11. Extremely low Support - Let's give him a chance. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Terra-287 (Approved)

• Nominator: Terra-287
• Reason for nomination: I am nominating myself since I believe I am quite capable of doing the job of a cmod. I am on often, popular, and I can enforce rule if need be. I have a very good skill in understanding others and I will not allow for harassment or bullying. Aswell I am very open to anyone, even if they are someone I do not like, I will not ban with out good reason. Vote for me if u like me! ^^
• Date of nomination: March 16, 2012

For (10/1)

1. Support - As per the nomination Sgt Stacker117 20:04, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - As per nomination Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:23, March 16, 2012 (EST)
3. Support - I would like to vote for Mr. Obama for President of the Uniti- Ummm...I mean. Yes, Terra would be a great CMod. I rarley see him/her/it rage or act immature. As per nomination. Berry Punch http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/BerryPunch.png ^(Contribs) 01:46, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
4. Some Support - I know we have a plenitude of chat mods but I am willing to give this user a chance. Perhaps we could start some sort of "Chat Mod Reserve" force thingy-whatsits. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
5. Support - For this, because..like..far out IDaring DoI 01:44, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
6. Extremely low support - While I think he would be a rather rule-avoider Mod, he would be looking out for bad guys and we have a lot of Cmods. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)
7. Support - As per the nomination Sierra024 02:34, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support - He... she... this gender confused child is a good enough user and seems to want to really help. Even looked over the rules... something I don't think anyone else has done. XD Rarity ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)} 02:38, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
9. Support - As per the nomination Novabomb1--Boom goes my waffles. Nova 19:41, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support -I do think that there are too many chat mods on this godforsaken wiki but this could be one of the few needed because this entity is always on never aggressive and worthy of Chat moderator status.--LETP Rainbow Communist Dash 23:51, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral (2/0)

1. Neutral - I would support this because Terra would make a good mod, but he/she does break some rules on occasions. I can't decide on this one...
   
    ^talk
2. Neutral - Agreed with Vid. —Octavia ^{(Contribs) (Blog)}

Against (3/0)

1. Oppose - There are plenty of CMs. Dainer 21:40, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
2. Oppose - I don't think we are in need of more CMs right now. YouNoobxD94 19:28, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
3. Oppose - user has show he is inmature and has volated rule 19 alot SheerAvenger777 BAM, SAID THE LADY 00:35, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

# Oppose - You are Gravemind. A sockpuppet of him, I think you are not good for a Mod and besides, we have plenty of CMods. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) I changed my mind.

Novabomb1 (Approved)

• Nominator: Novabomb1
• Reason for nomination: I have nominated myself because I am almost always in the chat, users there know me well and I do my best to follow by chat rules. I may tend to show misconduct in the chat, but it's minor and kept under control. If a user has a problem in the chat, I try to see if there's anything I can do to help them. I admit that I'm not the most strict person, but I do my best in keeping some amount of order. Anyways, if you think I should be a c-mod or not, just vote.
• Date of nomination: March 20, 2012

For (10/1)

1. Support - As per nomination, he is here extremely early everyday and i rarely see him rage i think he would make a good cmod Sgt Stacker117 17:08, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - I have trained you well, son. You are ready. :3
   
    ^talk
3. Support - unsure of his capabilities, but he is willing --Terra-287 19:48, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support - As per nomination Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:38, March 20, 2012 (EST)
5. Support - We have a ton of Cmods, but he would be almost a better mod than me. Yea I might be a little bad sometimes but otherwise I can be a good moderator. Anyways good luck Nova! Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)
6. Some Support - While we are clearly starting to become "over-moderated", I think this user has potential. But seriously, "Chat Mod Reserve" force thingamajig-whatchamacallit. -Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
7. Support - I support you completly Vid...I mean Nova. Lol I stole Sniper's joke, oh wait he might come out to kill me wait, what is tha- OH SHIjgkadshgjklsdhigbibaojkhbguoiaysgbyaijsdadsghfda Berry Punch http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/BerryPunch.png ^(Contribs) 21:29, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support That was a major mistake on my part. I have nothing against this then. I wish you well mate, good luck. --Teller ^{Words, On my Screen :O} 12:12, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
9. Support We already have enough CMods; you are the last support I'll give in a while, BUT I think you deserve it. Good luck. YouNoobxD94 16:04, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support- Can't believe i forgot to vote for myself XD There i did it. 22:49, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

Against (0/0)

# Oppose - Sorry but I believe it states quite clearly that there must be 50 mainspace, if you all had checked it properly you would've noticed this. Rules are rules and they shouldn't be lenient to just one guy. Sorry, but it's a Nay. --Teller ^{Words, On my Screen :O} 07:12, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

While your concerns are perfectly valid; the rules say that voters must have 50 mainspace edits, not the nominee. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

User:Lordedwardthunderpants (Declined)

• Nominator: Lordedwardthunderpants
• Reason for nomination:I've been here long enough.I'm rarely not on.I have never acted harsh to another person,and When there is spam on the chat at night and early morning no one is there to stop them. I however could and would stop the spam.
• Date of nomination: March 28,2012

For (10/0)

Support - I support you, comrade.

 ^talk

I have changed my mind. We currently have enough mods.

 ^talk

1. Support - We do have tons of cmods but I do think ed will be able to pull it off as a good cmod, he has also created a wiki which he manages, sincerely comrade Sgt Stacker117 21:21, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - I've seen him plenty of times in the chat, more often when there's not many mods there to help out.Don't know why i'm here. Don't care. 22:28, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support - As per nomination.--RainbowSovietSupahDash 21:33, April 2, 2012 (UTC)17:22, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support - I very much feel like Edward would make a great moderator, as he is very serious but knows how to have fun without offending other members. You have my full support! Pinkie Pie http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/IconSIG1.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
5. Support Per nomination. Rarity ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)} 17:06, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support - I think Ed will hold true to his promises and he is not aggressive on chat. He won't be a jerk and he won't screw around. --Circulating Peace 03:38, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support -ODST 17:18, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support - Mr.479 (UTC)
9. Low Support - This is my last support (really this time) for a while. We are overmoderated, but I give him a chance. Good luck, comrade. YouNoobxD94 18:20, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Against (6/2)

1. Oppose - not that i dont think he might be able to do the job, but we have wayyyyyy to many cmods-Terra-287 21:11, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
2. Oppose - WAY to many Cmods. As per Terra. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)
3. Oppose - There's enough as it is. --Teller ^{Words, On my Screen :O} 00:36, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
4. Oppose - As per everyone else. --Spartacus ^{Contributions} 00:46, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
5. Oppose - We have a plenitude of chat mods right now. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
6. Oppose - There's enough Moderators, currently. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Neutral (1/1)

• Neutral I am not going to comment on his ability for chat moderation, seeing as I rarely join you. But I do think that we have enough mods, with 8 as it is and Novabomb probably going to be one. Not to mention the admins/brcrats on the site as it is.
  

Blue The Timber Wolf (Accepted)

• Nominator: CelestiaOfEquestria
• Reason for nomination: He is very friendly, gets along well with others. Could deal with hateful users easily in my opinion and he is here often and almost everyday. He doesn't lose his cool often, even during massive chat fights *cough* Civil War last night. *cough* Anyways, I would think he would be a great Chat Moderator and will know his place and know when to use his powers.
• Date of nomination: April, 5th, 2012.
• Date of Closure: April 15th, 2012.

For (11/3)

1. Support - As the nominator. Berry Punch http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/BerryPunch.png ^(Contribs) 15:59, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - i want blue to be a mod, hes awesome -Midnight Wish 16:23, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
3. Some Support - As per the nomination. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
4. Support - Great user, gets my vote. Hope it helps Blue. Shotgun02 21:09, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support He's almost always calm and collected, and tends to be very responsible. And I trust him explicitly, so he's capable (in my eyes) of the keys to the chat - and a bit later, Rollback and Administrator rights. -Leo Fox (My bark is probably bigger than my bite) 21:27, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support - Sure. Why not? Rarity ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)} 23:07, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support - I support Blue because he is very well mannered,friendly,and above all respectful KPA Soldier2027KPA Soldier2027 A.K.A.Belarus
8. Support Because you're awesome and don't start fights and try to solve arguments instead. Pinkie Pie http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/IconSIG1.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
9. Support - he is the most kind and nice person in chat, he wouldnvr abuse his power --Terra-287 02:37, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support - Calm, thoughtful, smart, nice, and trustworthy; He is the one we need, and we need more people like Blue. - SovietHero (BLIPBLOBZ)
11. Support} Blue The Timber Wolf 21:30, April 13, 2012 (UTC)

# Support - I support Blue cause he's pretty cool with noobs like me-Jtop90 18:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC) User does not have enough edits to vote. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

# Support - Blue was one of the greatest people on chat before i got banned. unfairly. But. that aside, Blue is nice, and he can control himself. he would be great to be a chat mod. Dannoh403 20:59, April 5, 2012 (UTC) User does not have enough votes. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Against (5/2)

1. Oppose - As much as I believe Blue would make a great moderator, we currently have enough.
   
    ^talk
2. Oppose - There's enough Moderators in chat. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  
3. Oppose - there are to many mods already - sheer
4. Oppose - Even without me, there are to many Moderators. Besides, i'm getting my rights tommorow. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)
5. Oppose - I'm sure this wiki adds 1 or 2 new mods per week. As good as his qualifications may be, our current numbers are sufficient. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

XXSpartan 135Xx (approved)

• Nominator: Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки
• Reason for nomination: We need a late night early morning moderator.
• Date of nomination: April 24, 2012

For (2)

1. Support - It's true that Ace is active when the current Moderators are asleep or offline. Of all the users in that time period, he's the best candidate. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  
2. Support - As per Ultra's statement. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Comments

Id say ace is an awesome candidate he's always there when no other chat mods are n he nows how handle certian situations CWB

GO ACE! Be a good chat mod x3 --IShadowX 15:58, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

As per my Nomination and he's an overall achiever. Can get anything done in a short time and earned his respect.Sierra One Two User:Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки 00:55, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support - well i heard i could vote for myself, but anyway. yes i am always on whenever the other chat mods are not due to my different timezone. XXSpartan 135Xx ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)}

You heard wrong. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Low Support - We have WAAY to much mods, but he could be a good mod. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Support He is awake when most or all of the mods are asleep. Dmatman 864 03:48, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Strong Support - Although we have too many moderators at the moment, Ace is online when most moderators are offline, and that is essential to the chat.

 ^talk

I know ace,he fits the qualifications for the job and i know he'll do a excelant job -Marquis-B589

Neutral I am not entirely convinced we need more mods, even during his timezone where chat is mostly dead. Sgt D Grif 04:17, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Circulating Peace (declined)

• Nominator: Circulating Peace
• Date of Nomination: May 22nd, 2012
• Reason for Nomination: I've been on Halo Nation since January 2012 and have learned a lot since then. I've edited things from small mistakes to making a page, and I've been on chat ever since I joined. So I have experience in chat. I think I'm ready to jump in and take the next step in Halo Nation, and I believe the next step is becoming a chat moderator. I think I am ready to take that responsibility. But do you think I am. Share your comment, Support me, or Oppose me. If I do become a chat moderator I will use it responsibly, respectfully, patiently, maturely, kindly, and wisely.

Against (1)

Oppose - It's not that I don't think you'll turn out to be a good Moderator, it's just that your lack of activity is suspect. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Oppose I'm afraid that I don't believe you have shown yourself enough to be a chat moderator. Being a chat moderator is more than being active, it is puposefully striving beyond your own capacity to help others and make the chat a better place, something I have yet to see you do, sorry. 17:55, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - You're hradly on the chat so i dont think you would be fit for the job. 19:02 (EST) May 26, 2012 {C Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Oppose As per Techno and Evo. Grif was here (talk) 01:37, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Also, another reason why I think I should become a mod is that in the last couple of weeks we have lost three mods. (Not gonna name names). Currently there are only 8 mods and I would like to be added to that list. Circulating Peace 00:55, May 31, 2012 (UTC) 1755 hours-May 30, 2012: United States

ONLY eight mods!? You, sir/ma'am, need to go back to first grade. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Oppose As Per Evo Ive barely even seen you.And Seven mods who are always on is good enough.Лордhttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120504233120/sovietussrunion/images/4/49/F22.gif 03:07, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well now only 7 out of 200-250 Halo Nation Members. We should at least have a dozen to like 15. I'm a sir. Circulating Peace 19:18, June 1, 2012 (UTC) 1217 hours-June 1, 2012: U.S.A

Armybuddy (declined)

• Nominator: Armybuddy
• Date of Nomination: June 2nd, 2012
• Reason for Nomination: Hi There i would love to be a mod im always on the chat so i will be perfect I will not do anything bad Wont Kick or Ban People for Stupid Reasons Please pick me

Against (1)

Oppose - You're not fit to be a Mod. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Oppose - I haven't seen this user enough and from what I have seen I don't think this user would do very well. Regards.--Spartacus ^{Contributions} 02:02, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose Your actions on the chat are a sign to us that you're not Ready to have this kind of responsibility.-- Soviet Rainbow Dash 20:05, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral My Opinion on this would seem very Bias under the current circumstances. —This unsigned comment is made by Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Oppose - Sorry, I just don't think you are chat moderator material. 20:02, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose You've just joined HN and aren't on Chat enough to be qualified for a mod. I think you need some more time on Halo Nation and its chat. Circulating Peace 00:38, June 4, 2012 (UTC) 1838 hours-June 3, 2012: U.S.A

Oppose As per UF's statement. Grif was here (talk) 21:05, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки (declined)

• Nominator: Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки
• Date of Nomination: June 2nd,2012
• Reason for Nomination: Well, I've been here long enough, and since the last time Ive gotten more experience. From what I've seen we don't need to stockpile mods ,We need different possibly better mods. It's time for new leadership.

Against (1)

Oppose - Agreed, we need better Moderators than the ones before. You're just not one of the several candidates I have in mind. No offense. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Oppose - Per Ultra Force.--Spartacus ^{Contributions} 04:07, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - Whilst I hold nothing against you, or your conduct, I've just not seen much from you that makes you stand out as a Chat Moderator candidate. We have lots of members in our community that abide by the rules and would do a lot better than previous CM's, you're one of many I'm afraid. 12:30, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

Understood Ultra.I'm Glad to see we can all agree on that. Soviet Rainbow Dash 20:09, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Ultra could you please tell me what disqualifies me from the ones you have in mind?-- Soviet Rainbow Dash (U.S.S.R) (Office) 01:14, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral I think you would make a great chat mod because you seem to have a deceit attitude for the task, but I don't see you enough on H.N chat. Circulating Peace 00:54, June 4, 2012 (UTC) 1854 hours-June 3, 2012: U.S.A

Circulating Peace the reason you don't see me on the chat may be the fact your not on when I'm on, and even then there is a good possibility that you live in a different timezone than me.-- Soviet Rainbow Dash (U.S.S.R) (Office) 01:14, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support Honestly, you're one of the few sensible people on chat regularly. Grif was here (talk) 20:06, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support Ed is one of the few Reasonable people on Halo nation. Marquis-B589

Support As per My own Nomination. -- Soviet Rainbow Dash 01:35, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

T3CHNOCIDE (approved)

• Nominator: Ultra Force
• Reason for nomination: He's a perfect candidate IMO. He's mature, knows what's right, is active, and is very caring for the wiki. Not to mention the need for international Moderators since the list has always been dominated by Americans leading to less security in chat from early morning to the afternoon in US timezones. Most Moderators during that time are either sleeping or busy with school or work.
• Date of nomination: June 7th, 2012

For (3)

• Support - As per my nomination. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  
• Support - I see no problem with this. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
• Support — Seems like a nice and responsible guy to me. The amount of monitoring and oversight he's done without being asked is fantastic. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

Comments

Support - From what I've seen, this user is very mature and IMO could handle Chat Moderation rights responsibly.--Spartacus ^{Contributions} 02:29, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

THE MOST EXTREME SUPPORT EVER. -- Soviet Rainbow Dash 07:06, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support- I would agree that he knows the difference between right and wrong, seems very mature, is very active, and is always out to keep the chat a good place. - Halo4master 14:30, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Support - As per nomination.

 ^talk

Support -I agree with everyone else that supports T3CH. He's on chat quite often and he has a great attitude for the task. We need more mods like this. Circulating Peace 17:22, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Hes on at afternoon when no one else is here 14:04 June 14, 2012 (EST) Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Support - He seems like a good choice for a mod, and has the support of two bureaucrats and an admin. Grif was here (talk) 08:22, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Support - He would make a great mod. I agree with Peace, he does have a great attitude and he is also usually on the chat. 19:17, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

SheerAvenger777 (approved)

• Nominator: Ultra Force
• Reason for nomination: I shall begin by expressing my acknowledgement that yes, this is a controversial nomination. However, hear me out. As an ex-Moderator, not only does Sheer has quite a bit of experience, but his sense of justice, the pursuit of order, and love along with passion for this wiki and its video game franchise are unmatched. His intelligence however, is underrated. Too often, he gets bullied and picked on in chat for his inadequate grammar skills when typing. Folks who pay attention realize that his spelling is fine (apparently, grammar and spelling are the same thing. herp derp!). As for claims of homophobia, he has long abandoned any remarks against gays (if there was any at all). Trust me, as a long-time friend of Sheer, I know that he's a heterosexual who means no harm to anyone of that like just because of their sexual orientation.
• Date of nomination: June 7th, 2012

For (1)

Support - As per my (somewhat detailed) nomination. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Support - Per Ultra. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Support - The user has shown integrity and honesty, coupled with his experience and motivation I think he will make a fine Chat Moderator, Good luck! 14:04, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I strongly agree with with Ultra and Technocide. Sheer has a great attitude for a chat mod and is on quite chat often. Circulating Peace 23:38, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Support - As per the nomination.

 ^talk

Marquis-B589 (declined)

• Nominator: SergeantUltra
• Reason for nomination: He's always on and obeys all rules. He would be a great Mod.
• Date of nomination: June 16th, 2012

Against (1)

Oppose - Almost everyone obeys rules in chat. A lot of people are active too. If we were to promote users by those reasons alone, our Mod Team would be 90% of chat population.
https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

But Ultra, a lot of the chat population is new people. And 10% of the new people get banned by me or someone else because of nonsense or trolling. Your reason IS valid, but i'm just saying. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Comments

Support - As per nomination. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Oppose - As per Ultra Force. Circulating Peace 06:24, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I have yet to seen him act in a way that would cause any problems and he seems to be very sensible and mature. Grif was here (talk) 08:18, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Support - He would make a good chat mod. I agree with grif he does act mature and he is online quite often. 7:27, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I actually think Marq would be good for a mod. As for the reasons the everyone that supports him. Circulating Peace 15:24, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Halo4master (approved)

• Nominator: T3CHNOCIDE
• Reason for nomination: Whilst I agree the number of moderators being voted in is reaching our saturation point, Halo4master should be one! He not only abide by the rules as a candidate should, he goes beyond that, he intentionally makes it his job to make new users feel welcome, and to calm situations where needed. If it wasn't for Halo4 and his valiant efforts, many chat crisis' would have ended up a lot worse. Halo4 is on all day, covering GB morning, to USA evening, only leaving the chat for a few precious moments of sleep. His paroling is unparalleled and I believe he would make a perfect moderator because of it.
• Date of nomination: 18th June 2012

For (2)

Support - I told him not to nominate himself a few days ago. Who was I kidding? He's definitely a can't-miss candidate. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}   Support - I have no major objections to this. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Comments

Support - As per my Nomination 12:10, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support- H4M has made great improvements and progress during his time here, and I now feel quite confident in him as a mod. Grif was here (talk) 08:16, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Support - After I read the comments, I agree that he would make a great chat mod considering that he has a great attitude and all 14:30, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - He's only been a member since June 3rd of this year. That is only 17 days on the chat. H4M is great and may be good for the job, but I think he needs more time on Halo Nation. We should really see if he continues to stay on the chat as much as he is now after a month at least or so. -Circulating Peace 04:21, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Despite only being here for 17 days, he has shown persistent kindness and maturity, and willingness to not only abide by the rules, but help inforce them. More than I can say for members who have been here for several months more. Half a month, whilst short, is still enough time to get to know the Wiki, and especially the chat. I have no doubt that he will do a fine job, despite his apparent newness. 10:56, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - 17 days, before I got banned those few times, I could have had the chance to become a Cmod, given the criteria you are grading him on, as I started talking in the chat a few months ago. True, he is polite, and ollows all the rules, but that alone is not enough. Simply not enough. Cossa66 - the Foreunners are correct, not you, Prophets. 14:11, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - It is true that he is very well mannered and is not easily aggrivated, he simply does not have enough experience to be allowed these powers. Fusion-x - The ultimate gaming and comedy experience

User lacks the required edits. 12:37, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

19:00, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Commander Church (approved)

• Nominator: Vidmas7er
• Reason for nomination: I believe that Church could be a great mod. As he is a nice person, follows the rules on the chat, and above all I think he has the potential to become a moderator.
• Date of nomination: June 18th, 2012

For (1)

Support - There were a few incidents when he gets a little carried away but I'm convinced after a short interview with Church that he will handle the responsibility of Moderating quite well.
https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Support - As per my nomination.

 ^talk

Support - As per nom nom 20:20 June 18, 2012 (EST) Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Neutral - Based upon a few actions I've seen from this user, I'm not convinved if he's quite ready to be a mod. Grif was here (talk) 08:28, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - Despite the user being a fun, and kind individual, he presents himself in a rather aggressive manner; he swears far too often, and makes users feel ill at ease. If the individual was to change their approach to the use of swear words and the like, I would be more than happy to change from oppose to support. 18:10, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Sgt D Grif (approved)

• Nominator: Ultra Force
• Reason: Grif understands the chat and its issues as good as I do. He can express authority pretty well and is quite intelligent.
• Date: June 20th, 2012

For (2)

Support - As per my nomination. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Support - I have no objections. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Comments

Support - Grif is often told to shut up all the time. I personally think that this is abuse, and he is quite one of the best users there. He should be a mod. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 03:43, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Grif helps out the mods even without mod rights to support him. Hell, he moderates the chat better than me. I am looking forward to see him on the mod team... If he does get promoted. ;)

 ^talk

02:00, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support -he is kind but respectful. he shows responsibility and consideration before an action. he respects the policies and will make a very good mod. TACO117 12:07, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - I feel that Grif sometimes asserts his authority too much in chat, as I have several times been given into 'trouble' for reasons that Grif thought were against the rules, but in fact turned out not to be or on a different condition/situation. If Grif were to become a moderator, I plead that he read the Chat Policy again (I was even kind enough to link it). Fusion-x - The ultimate gaming and comedy experience.

I have yet to get you in trouble as far as I am aware of, and any statements I have made to users outside the Chat Policy were merely personal requests on my behalf that held no merit as a punishable or enforceable statement. Any other exception of something I have tried to enforce in chat would be something for the sake of maintaining non-conflictive natural flow of chat. Also, please bear in mind that a moderator may have to make a ruling that is not covered in the chat rules. During my time on chat, anything that would have come to pass would only have been enforceable by an actual moderator who would be quite aware of the chat rules, just as I am. Therefore, any "trouble" you may have been in would be the act of another moderator. If you believe that there is something unfair I have done to you, or any feedback or criticisms that you would like to tell me personally, please contact me in chat so we can discuss this, preferably in PM as to not invoke conflict in chat or bring non-involved parties in. As for asserting authority, I do admit I have made attempts to enforce chat rules and diffuse situations when we are either lacking moderators, or said moderators are not actively on the chat. And while I am disappointed by your opposition, I am glad that you have voiced your point of view for the sake of this chat. Users should feel confident in their moderators, and if anything makes you unconfortable, I do wish to address it to the best of my ability. Grif was here (talk) 12:44, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

User lacks required number of edits 13:44, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Support - He would make a great mod. 10:36, July 3, 2012 (UTC) -- Dmatman 864 10:39, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Spartacus0898 (approved)

• Nominator: Halo4master
• Reason for nomination: I have been watching for Spartacus for a while now. He seems to understand the rules and how to behave in a civil manner, understands how they should be enforced , how to enforce them, and has been a great help in times of trouble. I believe that he will definitely be a great moderator.
• Date of nomination: August 13, 2012

For (2)

1. Support - He seems to be worthy of this, based off of what I've seen. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:46, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - After a week of monitoring the individual, I am confident in his moral judgement and his ability to moderate the chat to the standard we here at Halo Nation expect. Good luck. 23:17, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral (1)

Neutral - Not quite sure what to think of this. I'd question his loyalty and whether he would take the job "seriously". Keep in mind that he prefers Halopedian and conforms to the ideals of Nicmavr and Subtank. For now, I'm staying cautious. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Neutral - The individual seems to have his head in the right place, and seems to have good moral judgements. He also appears to really care about the wiki, evidence shown in the work he's done so far. However, I to am a little cautious of a misunderstanding in policies between HP and HN. My vote is neutral for now, meaning it is subject for change during this nomination period, so I shall remain watchful.

10:47, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Support - As per my nomination. TheUltimateH4M ^Talk 18:37, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - I think we got more than enough mods.. - Evodvi 14:57 August 13, 2012 (EST)

This is not really an issue as of yet - yes the moderator list is saturated, however, we are further planning to refine the list with removals. Not to mention we have just demoted two of our moderators. However, this is merely an observation, not support for the nomination.

21:08, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - At this time I don't see Spartacus as being the right choice for a chat moderator on Halo Nation. Grif was here (talk) 22:22, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral - After having seen Spartacus spend more time on this chat, I now withdraw my initial opposition. I'm not supportive of this nomination, but no longer hold any opposition. Grif was here (talk) 04:21, August 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - I don't really think we need any more mods right now. We have plenty. I think the chat is perfectly fine right now. Circulating Peace _(Talk)

Bravadostock (approved)

• Nominator: T3CHNOCIDE
• Reason for nomination: Bravadostock is an active member of the chat and abides to the chat rules heavily. He has a great moral judgement, and is a key contributor to the wiki. He will also be able to monitor the chat during times where other chat moderators are not available. Because of this I believe that Bravadostock will make an excellent moderator, capable of maintaining our high expectations.
• Date of nomination: September 4th, 2012

For (2)

1. Support - As per my nomination, good luck! 20:36, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - There are those who say we have plenty of mods, but the vast majority of those mods are only available during a certain part of the day. We need more non-American users to better cover the other times of day. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Comments

Support — As per T3CH.

 ^talk

Support Bravadostock has been a responsible and intelligent member of chat, and I'm sure he will be able to moderate appropriately. Grif was here (talk) 20:46, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support - As per everyone else. Also, why does the nomination date say August 9th?--Spartacus0898 (Talk) 21:36, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Because I'm and idiot xD Herp derp 00:05, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

XD - TheUltimateH4M ^Talk 20:32, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Bravado seems like a great candidate to me, and I believe he would be a great addition to the chat moderator team. TheUltimateH4M ^Talk 23:54, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - Yes, I think Brava will make a great mod, but at this time we have plenty of mods. Quite often when I am on chat seems to be more mods on then regular users. There were fourteen people on and nine of them were mods (or admins). I think brava will make a great mod. But we should wait til we actually need mods. We do not 'need' more mods right now. - Circulating Peace _(Talk)

<rant>I find the "too many mods" argument to be a poor reason to oppose. There's never a limit to the amount of mods or admins a wiki can have. I don't understand why people bring this up every time there's a nomination. Take it this way: If you owned a bank that had a lot of money, would you want five guards guarding it, or twenty guards? Obviously, you'd pick twenty, since that's more protection. It's the same situation here. Keep in mind, Bravado can be on when most of the American moderators are away, so there shouldn't be an issue with it. If you think he'd make a good mod, then why don't you vote for him?</rant>--Spartacus0898 (Talk) 21:50, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

"Keep in mind, Bravado can be on when most of the American moderators are away, so there shouldn't be an issue with it."

Well, I was going to reply with that, but looks like I've been beat to it.
TheUltimateH4M ^Talk 22:50, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

That depends, Spartacus. I'd rather have 5 excellent guards than 20 shitty guards. Quality over quantity, people. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Indeed. But, 20 excellent guards would be better still. And from what I understand, the only issue the original commenter (CP) has here is one of quantity, not quality. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Too many mods may be a poor reason but it is a reason, you cant have a chat with everyone as mod now can you? :P Also i think it depends on the skill of the moderater - Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:31 September 17, 2012 (EST)

As per everyone else who has spoken. We have enough moderators to make sure that, during the American timezone, the chat is well monitored. However, we have an issue during GMT to Australiantimezones where only XX Spartan 135Xx is availible. Bravadostock is both capable and available, and therefore the perfect choice.

17:32, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

Sapphire Revolution (closed)

• Nominator: Ultra Force
• Reason: With the resignation of Ace and possible demotion of Church, I choose Sapphire. I've interviewed him and I assure you, he makes the right decisions and has a lot of care for the chat. I won't say that I'm not skeptical about this nomination but I believe in it. SR is also one of the few people I absolutely can trust.
• Date: September 23rd, 2012

Support (1)

Support - https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

I choose to cancel my own nomination... https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Neutral (1)

Neutral - I question the users integrity and ability to act on a situation with a calm and collected head. I have been inactive for some time and therefore may be forming a decision without the correct amount of information. I therefore have chosen to stay open minded about the matter and monitor the individual's behaviour until I see fit to change my vote.

19:40, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Full Support - Per Ultra Force. TheUltimateH4M ^Talk 20:33, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

Support - As per the nomination.

 ^talk

Neutral - Don't really know the individual, so I can't really know how he'd do.--Spartacus0898 (Talk) 23:45, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

• Support - As per above.--Spartacus0898 (Talk) 03:05, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral - SR occasionally gets a little over-excited during situations, and while I'm not quite ready to support him, I'm remaining neutral to give him a chance. Grif was here (talk) 03:01, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

What do you mean "over-excited"? https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

As per T3CH's statement about "calm and collected", when situations have arisen in chat, I've seen SR get a tad energetic and not exactly helpful for the situation. Of course this behavior might completely change with him actually having chat moderator abilities to diffuse or solve the scenario, but just from what I've seen, I'm not confident in SR being placed a problematic situation yet. Grif was here (talk) 20:19, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, that's understandable. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

SWATminifigGUY (approved)

• Nominator: Halo4master
• Reason: With the final resignation of Church, I choose SWAT to take his place. SWAT has shown that he knows the rules well and can enforce them, and has shown that he is very trustworthy, and after a short interview in PM, has shown that he would make a great spot on the team.
• Date: September 24th, 2012

Support (3)

1. Support Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
2. Support - This user is active, and most of all, has a good sense of moral judgement and therefore I believe he will be a fantastic choice for a position as chat moderator. 00:01, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support - Let's get a Canadian on the team, eh? https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Support - Per nomination. TheUltimateH4M ^Talk 02:23, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Support - As per H4M.

 ^talk

Support - He's definitely worthy of this, based off what I've seen.--Spartacus0898 (Talk) 02:30, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I've had SWAT in mind as a possible future chat moderator, and I believe he will be able to adjust to become a chat mod. He's been mature enough to cause very few issues in chat, is obedient, and should be able to become a good moderator. Grif was here (talk) 03:08, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Definitely good enough. Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:02, September 25, 2012 (EST)

Requests for removal of Chat Moderation rights

CelestiaOfEquestria (declined)

• Nominator: Terra-287
• Reason for nomination: He has never shown responsibility as the role of a cmod, yes he is popular and people like his randomness and joking self, however, this is not the requirements for a cmod. A cmod should usually follow the rules, and be very respectful of others. He has not shown these qualities, nor has he ever shown them, he is rude, disrespectful, breaks the rules with half of what he says, and is irresponsible with his cmod privileges, such as banning a noob just because he was bored and didn't like the individual. His most recent abhorred act was his rudeness and trying to make fun of the user blair and her current condition of being in the hospital for attempted suicide. In my opinion he is a nice guy, but he hasnt, nor ever, shown the qualities to make a chat moderator.
• Date of nomination: March 27, 2012

For (2/0)

1. Support - there really is no point in me puting this the outcome is allreday know.... but i agree with the nomintaion SheerAvenger777 BAM, SAID THE LADY 01:05, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support - Cel is always calling me "General Sandy Vagina" and shit, calling Ultra "Sir Kidney Stone McSoysauce", and constantly making jokes about serious crap. He kickbans for no valid reason. I think he should be demoted. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Against (7/2)

1. Oppose - —Octavia ^{(Contribs) (Blog)}
2. Oppose - Not everyone reacts to those sort of things the same way you do, Terra. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
3. Oppose - As per Karl.
   
    ^talk
4. Oppose - As per the above Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}
5. Oppose- I think that Cel is an effective mod, though he may be erratic, he does show concern in the chat. And i would also say that you're not the best mod we had in the chat. No offense. Don't know why i'm here. Don't care. 21:41, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
6. Oppose - Yeah, no. Not from what I've seen. -Leo Fox (My bark is probably bigger than my bite) 03:55, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
7. Oppose - Cel is doing perfectly fine, he knows when to stop and does so when he's informed. Pinkie Pie http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/IconSIG1.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Novabomb1 (approved)

• Nominator: Ultra Force
• Reason for nomination: Hasn't been seen since given Moderation rights.
• Date of nomination: April 25th, 2012

For (1)

1. Support - As per my nomination. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Support - I'm sure that he would be a good mod if he still went on chat. As per nomination.

 ^talk

Support - As per nomination. Pinkie Pie http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/IconSIG1.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Support As per nomination,..  Bravado ^Talk

Support As per Ultra. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Support- I wish i was on. But I broke the modem at home so i'm screwed until then. >.< WTFH?!?! There i did it. 15:33, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

Support The nominee agrees with the ruling, and I agree with the nomination as well. Sgt D Grif 04:12, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support As per myself. --Sierra One Two]] User:Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки 15:30, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Blue The Timber Wolf (Declined)

• Nominator: TheUknownHorseman
• Reason for nomination: In recent weeks it has become increasingly obvious that not only does he not have anywhere near the current requirment of edits to be a chat mod (Which regardless of time of promotion, he still needs to keep up with the current standards) but he also uses his chat mod rights for personal attacks and to get rid of people he has personal grudges on, even after he has baited them into arguments. He is far too immature and far too lacking in the current prerequisites of becoming a mod. Therefore I hereby request that he be demoted from chat mod until he has met the current standards and has matured. His personal feelings about somebody should not be getting in the way of his better judgement.
• Date of nomination: May 5, 2012

Against (2)

Oppose - Could he be a better cmod? Maybe. But it doesn't seem that bad to me. Plus you aren't what exactly I would consider a good judge of maturity. -Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Oppose - I must admit my personal opinion on the matter is fundamentally biased; however, commenting as an impartial and responsible Bureaucrat, I find myself against this measure; but I must justify how my logical reasoning outweighs my personal bias. Well, for starters: TUH, you did break the rules by calling Blue corrupt, and he did give warnings - perhaps somewhat out of turn, but his conduct was following what I would do in the same situation: warn and ban. As I recall, I did tell both TUH and Blue to stop; and it was TUH who violated my Administrative Order to cease and desist discussion on the topic. As such, TUH, you sorta shot yourself in the foot there, because you baited him into banning him. Just handling that part of it first. Next, I must note that Blue was given his CM rights just prior to the new rules regarding CM nomination; as such, his Chat Moderatorship is upheld. As for maturity; well, can't we all be immature at times? At worst, Blue's conduct may result in an Administrative censure: but there have been more scandalous bannings on Chat than this. I think he deserves a second chance if anything; after all, wasn't TUH awarded a second chance? My personal opinion is that much of this is caused by the (still) lax banning policy we have for the Chat. This needs amendment, and this issue will help bring it about.
-Leo Fox (My bark is probably bigger than my bite) 08:20, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Oppose - I second the above statement. You attacked me personally, simply because you put yourself in a bad situation. I banned you for around four personal attacks and claiming Leo Fox, corrupt. All of which are ban-worthy. You obviously do not know what you are talking about. I wish you the best of luck in your endeavor. ;) Blue The Timber Wolf 00:59, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

(Reply to Karl's post) Actually Karl the current edit requirement is 50 articles and 50 blog/comments. As I was previously told when I inquiered about what I needed to do to become a chat mod. TheUknownHorseman 00:53, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Then whomever told you that did not know of what they spoke. The edit requirement was only for voting under the old cmod election system. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

(Reply to Blue's Post) I never said Leo was corrupt, only you. I did however say you wiggled your way into your postion. TheUknownHorseman 01:02, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I am hearing two sides of the story, as well as some from Leo. Ariel and Leo's claim seems a bit more...accurate then Blue's. Although I am friends with everyone here. I would like to state my opinion that I support this. Berry Punch http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/BerryPunch.png ^(Contribs) 01:01, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support I of course support this, not only for the personal attacks he has made against me, but also against many other people. Blue is far too imature for his postion -TheUknownHorseman

Support I support this he talks trash behind peoples back he has talked trash on quite a few occasions about Ariel and has kicked her without any official ground to be kicked only on personal grounds has he kicked Ariel from chat, and on that note that is the reason I support the removal of Blue's status as a mod.KPA Soldier2027 01:13, May 6, 2012 (UTC)KPA Soldier2027

Oppose i think blue is doing a good job i dont think he should be demoted SheerAvenger777 BAM, SAID THE LADY 01:24, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support I supposrt this wholeheartedly as from what I have seen he often uses his powers for his own personal vendettas by kicking and banning whether or not there was sufficient cause, because he simpily did not like the person. NightRavenGSA 01:18, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I'm sorry Blue, but I really do think that being a mod requires responsibility and maturity. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Neutral While I do agree Blue has made some poor choices as a moderator, he has also dealt with many problems in chat. While I do not wish for him to be demoted, I cannot with good consciousness oppose the points brought up. Sgt D Grif 04:09, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support I was asked to weigh in on this matter. As many wikis can tell you, I've been running a social experiment where I join different wiki chat rooms and take note of what sort of social community is currently present at said wikis. The moment I stepped in, I was called both a noob and a newfag by Blue, and I was constantly harrassed as being a troll and lurker during my stay in chat. If you truly need them, I do log every chat encounter, and I would be happy to provide a couple screenshot examples if they are indeed needed for this hearing. I personally don't think Blue needs these rights though, and it's quite obvious he made chat moderator because he had befriended someone here. (Still relatively new and with an extremely low edit count.) If anyone need me to expand my thoughts further, please leave me a message on my home wiki. (Nukapedia - The Fallout Wiki.) File:Dragon.jpg ^Skål! 13:55, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose i think blue is doing a good job i dont think he should be demoted SheerAvenger777 BAM, SAID THE LADY 01:24, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral He did make a lot of bad decisions in the chat, but Ariel did insult him many times and he gave warnings, so it's not his fault that he had to bann ariel, since she ignored the warnings. And, I think that yeah, he has been insulting people who are new and I can't really think if he should keep the rights after what he did to these users. Dmatman 864 03:01, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Blue The Timber Wolf, Evodvi and LunaSword (approved)

• Nominator: Nicmavr
• Date of nomination: May 17th, 2012
• Reason for nomination: Been observing these users over the past few days, and increasingly noticed signs of immaturity, power-abuse and unnecessary threats. Below are screenshots from this evening's chat session, where I was literally "silenced" and threatened with a ban for no reason. Subtank was also subjected to such threats, and despite warnings from Vidmas7er, they continued with their shenanigans.

Behaviour which is completely unacceptable for moderators. All 3 of these users are evidently not yet mature enough or ready to handle the role. Please get them out and replace them with new ones.

Regards,

- Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 23:19, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

Support (3)

Support - After seeing the screenshots I am convinced such a task is not to be trusted to these users as of now.

Support — As per above. Their conduct is completely unbecoming of the maturity and responsibility we expect of all staff members, especially moderators. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

Support - After witnessing an intriguing event today involving Sheer, Cel, Circulating Peace, Ascendant Justice, and several others, I must agree with Marissa and the other supporters of this nomination. These Moderation habits are unacceptable. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Support - Per the nomination. Rarity ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)} 00:31, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I really don't want to upset those 3 users like this but supporting this nomination is the right step forward. The way they're Moderating the chat is unacceptable. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Neutral (1)

Neutral - Due to conflicts of interest in this matter, I hereby must recuse myself from this for this vote. -Leo Fox (My bark is probably bigger than my bite) 01:30, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Against (1)

Oppose As per Circulating Peace, it is what everyone else does in chat, just joking around and having fun. Sniper ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)} 01:41, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

So you're basically saying "Breaking the rules is fine, as long as we all do it"? Sorry, but you're really making no sense. - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 09:46, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Extremely Strong -I concur, that conduct is clearly unnacceptable. Regards,--Spartacus ^{Contributions} 23:28, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

Support For the good of the wiki i support this with a heavy heart SheerAvenger777 BAM, SAID THE LADY 23:40, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

Support - From what I have seen, I must support this.

 ^talk

Support - As per my reasons above. - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 23:35, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Honestly this constantly happening in the chat has gotten quite annoying and is in my opinion unacceptable. And despite my positive feelings toward these individuals, I sadly agree with this proposal. Sgt D Grif 02:38, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support - After seeing the "proof", I clearly thought it was unacceptable, and, not trying to make Blue, Evo, and Luna mad, I must support this. Fluttershy (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits)

Support - This is similar to how I got banned from chat without breaking any rules. Norion3 18:58, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

Support - We need more initiative; we can't simply allow "conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman" to run rife simply because we do not wish to offend the users in question.

Neutral I now stand Neutral because I cannot decide whether or not these three should be demoted or not. I have my own reasons. And I don't think my vote matters anyway. -Circulating Peace 1706 hours-May 19, 2012: Planet Earth

Oppose -- While opposing for myself is normally not done I believe that we should not be demoted. Much of the other mods do the same thing so are you going to demote them as well? We did not LITERALLY silence you and a user cannot actually tell a moderator what to do. Also Luna and Blue were voicing their opinion against you wanting to change this wikia. Now as for I your so called "proof" does not quite show me doing anything that wrong now does it? Oh and 3 demotions would you not need 3 seperate votes or perhaps 30 votes to make us demoted? Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 22:00, May 16, 2012 (EST)

Oppose I think we are fine as is. Although this should be avoided in the future. Everyone makes mistakes --Sgt Stacker117 02:18, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose I can't oppose nor agree with this with a clear conscience, but I will say that although I agree their behavior was rather unnacceptable, its been ongoing for months and few of us cared, so I can't condemn them for it. This is the fault of all of us, not just these three, since we failed to nip it in the bud when it first started.Still, I strongly believe that punishment should be dealt on an individual basis, not just because the three were collaborating, but because there are apparently different levels of involvement, and as such, it is unethical and unprofessional to merely punish all three due to ease of doing that compared to individually reviewing their actions. A.J. 02:02, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose After reading Nicmavr's 'evidence' I didn't really see a problem with these three. Everything I saw that they said on chat was everything I see from everyone else on chat. And they are all just joking around and having fun with each other. They also weren't breaking any of the wiki's rules or policies, so I see no harm here at all. -Circulating Peace    1200 hours-May 17, 2012: Planet Earth

Oppose As per per Sniper. We all (majority) use the chat for a good time and to fuck around with eachother. Nicmanvr obviously hasn't been here to see the whole chats behavior, we all act as such. (Usually.) ~Luna~ 01:49, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

And this consistency with being rude, disrespectful, and immature towards your fellow members allows you to believe that its an offense in which a norm is established making it okay to do? Having fun and joking around with others is all well and good, but being an ass to others and abusing your rights as a Moderator is far from that. The fact that you believe otherwise is further evidence towards you not being fit for responsibility. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

Luna, I've been a member for almost 4 years, far longer than you, and I've served as an admin for nearly 3 of them. The policies here in theory haven't changed since Halopedia's migration, so I think that's enough to say that I know a lot more about it than you. - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 09:46, May 18, 2012 (UTC)

DS2117 (approved)

• Nominator: Blue The Timber Wolf.
• Date of nomination: May 23, 2012.
• Reason for nomination: She is rarely here, I've seen her here twice in my 5 months (give or take a few days/weeks) of being here. Hence, I cannot, at the same time, judge how well of a job (chat-moderating) she does... But I think we need more room for Chat Moderators who will be able to actually be on chat and solve the chat's problems. Blue The Timber Wolf 04:18, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

Support (2)

• Low Support - DS seems like a decent enough Chat Mod when she's around. If she shows up with more frequency, I would have no problem withdrawing this vote. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

• Support - Rarely active anymore. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Oppose - She was on today at 8:20 pm est, and for chat mods that are new... we just got rid of a bunch we why would we replenish them with such a small chat now and "corruption"... Derpy Hooves http://i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp9/haloreplicas/DERP.png ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:25 May 26, 2012 (EST)

Support - Following from Karl's statement, I do not know this individual so can not fault their moderating capabilities, however, I don't think I have ever bumped into her. I am happy to withtract my vote so long as the individual returns to activity. 22:32, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Extremely Strong An Inactive Mod is a Useless Mod.As per T3CH and Karl. —This unsigned comment is made by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

CelestiaOfEquestria (approved)

Nominator: SheerAvenger777
Date of nomination: May 25th 2012
Reason for nomination: the user has been posting sexual content on the wiki witch volates wikis rule Sexual content is prohibited the user has shown he can not handle his rights and they should be taken away from this user below are some screenshots i took of the insadent

Support (4)

Strong support - Not to mention the countless times he has spammed, the racial remarks, the consistent abuse of the "kick" feature ever since Wikia updated the chat, and the sexual roleplay.
https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Support - I don't think anyone will question this is not only a HUGE disregard of the rules, also illegal to show pornographic images to minors. Also a ban is in place.

Just because you don't think anyone will question this does not mean you may disregard procedure and expedite the whole affair. Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Support — User in question has been troubled since his induction into Halo Nation's Staff. And despite many chances to redeem himself in becoming a responsible, trustworthy, and mature Moderator, it is clear yet again that his privileges were given prematurely. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

Support - While many of us have made our way to the line out of jest, this user deliberately crossed it. We can't keep it clean, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't at least try.-- Forerunner 21:56, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

Against (1)

Oppose - While I do have a vested interest in this, I oppose this because of the misconduct in how this nomination has been handled. - Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

You may oppose the quickened pass of the nomination but give me a reason why Cel shouldn't be demoted for his actions otherwise I'm afraid your opposition will be invalid. We're deciding whether he's fit to be a Mod (clearly, he doesn't), not a "misconduct" of this nomination. Therefore, your current reason doesn't count. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

'Quickened'? This was done in a day. -Leo Fox (My bark is probably bigger than my bite) 06:49, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Your point? Whatever, we'll follow usual procedures. Now, can we actually focus on supporting or opposing Cel's nomination and not a misconduct? I don't care if that bothered you, all that matters is whether anyone against this nomination explains why besides being purely biased.
https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Support — I'm sorry, but along with the evidence given in the above, every time I am on the chat the user disregards the rules how and when it pleases or benefits him. 17:41, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

Due to mishandling and speedily handled demotion of this CM, I hereby invalidated and rollback the ruling. As per the legal rule of Double Jeopardy, the said user has been already tried as per Sheer's remark and cannot be tried again for the offenses listed. -Leo Fox (My bark is probably bigger than my bite) 06:49, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

This is clearly another policy that needs reviewing. After seeing the images in question, I'm siding with Wilc0 and Ultra Force on this one, COE's conduct was unquestionably unacceptable even if he did not hold mod rights. If anything, Wilc0's speedy act was the correct path to take given the severity of the situation. There is no reason whatsoever to make this demotion request invalid because of the way it was handled; the point stands that the accused user violated the chat policy and should be dealt with in a fair manner. Frankly, if it was some other random user, I know well enough all of you would be rushing to get them banned without question. Bias is purely the only thing that's making these demotion requests slack. - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 14:55, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Leo, please review the Halo Natio Chat Policy, as Celestria has clearly violated many rules, the biggest maybe being posting pornographics in the chat. It is actually against the law to post pornographic material(s) to minors. Please think again about your rollback. Thank you much. Fusion-x - The ultimate gaming and comedy experience -- FusionxWolf 12:35, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Celestria has many a time violated the policy of Halo Nation by posting pornographic images, racial remarks and overally displaying bad discipline. I also find it extremely bad that administrators, who are here to keep this wiki in order and keep everybody in a safe enviroment, would cancel out this request for demotion. This is placing people's sense of safety in jeapordy. —This unsigned comment is made by FusionxWolf (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Terra-287 (approved)

• Nominator: Лорд-Эдвард-Гром-брюки
• Date of Nomination: May 22nd, 2012
• Reason for Nomination: User has not been on the chat to Moderate it.

Support (1)

Support - Agreed. She's not as active as before. https://i.imgur.com/skKwEi8.pngUltra Force^{Talk • Contributions}  

Comments

Extremely Strong I agree with the Nominator on this one. Soviet Rainbow Dash 19:45, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Of course you would agree with yourself. -_- Karl-591 ^{(Talk) (Contribs)}

Oh Hello Mind voting?:3 -- Soviet Rainbow Dash 00:15, June 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Blue is the wolfiest mod we've ever had (get it? Because he's a wolf? Aw, nevermind...)! -Sioneigh 18:52, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

i think it should stay as is. ~~ Helenna A-114~~

How many votes are needed now that us commoners cannot vote? - evodvi 14:01 May 18, 2012 (EST)

Am I not allowed to vote or something? -C.P 0244 hours-May 18, 2012: Planet Earth

I believe GRIZZLEI should've left her writing in the comments because she didn't oppose nor support this matter. Same with Nicmavr's response to Luna. If you have any responses or comments leave it in the comments. DUH!!! -C.P 0247 hours-May 18, 2012: Planet Earth

Nic, first. It doesn't matter if you have four years experience or your an Admin, whatever. You may have Halo Nation knowlege, but you don't have Halo Nation Chat knowlege. In my terms, that's what counts. I have not once seen you on chat before all this started. And also, who cares about who has what and who's better then him or her? Chat should just be used to CHAT, as it is implied, and do we really need all these moderators? We don't need ten when one can fit the deal. Just stop trying to change HN, we were fine well before you tried to change us. ~Luna~ 08:42, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Really? Newsflash for you; I've also been a chat op for Halopedia/Halo Nation for 3 years, which I think is more than enough time to prove I know about the Chat/IRC. Additionally, I think it does matter that I've been here for 4 years; there's quite a significant difference knowledge-wise between someone who's been a member for 4 years and someone who's been a member for a few months. Chat is a feature which was recently enabled, hence why I only started using it myself. Before that, we had IRC (and we still do); but the conduct policies are the same. Yeah, Chat is for chatting, but that's not what you were doing; you were blatantly abusing your op rights along with your buddies. And just like you said, there is no need to get any more moderators, I didn't suggest that you should necessarily be replaced, just demoted. The only thing I'm trying to "change" on here is to smash the corruption that this wiki is facing ever since staff members like yourself were appointed to govern this wiki/chat. And right back at you, *we* (as in, the community members that came before you) were fine before you came along and acquired op rights without the necessary maturity. Of course, you and your friends are obviously going to oppose this, simply out of bias and not actually taking the chat policies seriously. What you fail to realize is that being an op doesn't equal being able to do whatever you want. There are rules and policies which ops are also required to follow. If you're not willing to do so, then you're not worthy of handling the rights, simple as that. - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 10:38, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Why hello you just broke rule 10 stating we are corrupt. - evodvi 15:31 may 19, 2012 (EST)

Oh I'm sorry, did some tyranny put that rule there? Sorry if I stated a fact or opinion that they oppose... - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 20:23, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

Well whoever wrote that rule hilariously butchered the English language. But seriously, there is plenty of merit to Nicmavr or any other contributors referring to any of the accused moderators as "corrupted." Evodvi, this is not the course of action you should be taking right now. Grizzlei ♥ ツ